Web Hosting Talk







View Full Version : Linux or Windows hosting


Rudi
07-15-2002, 05:56 PM
Should I go for a Linux server/host or Windows server/host?

ntwaddel
07-15-2002, 05:59 PM
it depends on if you care about your site

if so, linux :D

-x - Ed - x-
07-15-2002, 07:33 PM
Amen brother...Linux all the way!

andiegirl
07-15-2002, 07:41 PM
Linux!

heretic
07-15-2002, 07:44 PM
I will NEVER, NEVER EVER use a windows server.


EVER.

Radix
07-15-2002, 07:57 PM
PHP, MYSQL, PERL, and Apache all love linux and thats one reason I love linux! Though Windows users wont be left in the cold.

Lats
07-15-2002, 07:59 PM
Keep the Linux votes coming :)


Lats...

JSpired
07-15-2002, 08:06 PM
Linux all the way!

phpjames
07-15-2002, 08:12 PM
MS blows, too expensive to use. Linux baby!

Skie
07-15-2002, 09:23 PM
i'd go for freeBSD or netBSD over linux, but its all UNIX, and reasonably the same. so my votes for linux.

i wouldn't use a Windows server unless I had something specific to do on Windows, which I do currently (SQL2K/.NET). Try to find a *NIX host that has Oracle or something installed :rolleyes:

phpjames
07-15-2002, 09:25 PM
True, MS is only good if you have a reason to use the platform, other than that you can accomplish anything MS can but freely and much more relaibly. No blue screen of death for me! ;-)

Lurleene
07-15-2002, 09:30 PM
Hmm, three people actually voted for Windows. :confused:

phpjames
07-15-2002, 09:48 PM
Probably Bill Gates, that loser fat guy who sweats a lot Steve something and a newbie screwing around. :eek:

phantasywork
07-15-2002, 10:15 PM
Linux all the way!

johnallen
07-15-2002, 10:47 PM
I really don't see any benefits from hosting on a Windows server. Can someone tell me any?

Studio64
07-15-2002, 11:01 PM
Originally posted by johnallen
I really don't see any benefits from hosting on a Windows server. Can someone tell me any?

b/c the GUI looks nice?... Oh wait... then they'd go for Mac...

umm.... securit... nevermind...
umm.... better software.... oh yeah... for a couple of grand more..
umm.... Anyone else want to answer :D...

Skie
07-15-2002, 11:26 PM
.NET and SQL Server. I've also heard that for large-scale e-commerce there are advantages to using Windows but I doubt it.

.NETs a good idea that was executed well, and SQL Server is an enterprise database that you don't need to pay a whole lot to get with a hosting account. i'm sorry, mySQL doesn't count. maybe r5 ;)

Jag
07-16-2002, 12:01 AM
you should add FreeBSD to the list...that has my vote.

ntwaddel
07-16-2002, 12:06 AM
Originally posted by johnallen
I really don't see any benefits from hosting on a Windows server. Can someone tell me any?


so you can run the office paperclip on your server ;)

Skie
07-16-2002, 12:23 AM
i've heard that in an effort to appeal to unix users, microsoft is going to release a version of the office paperclip for *nix systems. it should be about 350 megs, require product activation, and be annoying as always :D

XcaliburWS
07-16-2002, 12:28 AM
Linux of course! :D

elevation
07-16-2002, 02:30 AM
Linux is more stable :)

phpjames
07-16-2002, 02:38 AM
Originally posted by johnallen
I really don't see any benefits from hosting on a Windows server. Can someone tell me any?

None! Its infearior! :)

Other than that it may be usefull for applications specifically designed for the platform and for projects requiring other database solutions but as for just web serving static pages in general I dont think anyone would disagree that Linux is the way to go for that.

wheaties_box
07-16-2002, 03:13 AM
Linux rox

eddy2099
07-16-2002, 03:47 AM
Originally posted by johnallen
I really don't see any benefits from hosting on a Windows server. Can someone tell me any?

Well, there are several reasons why I prefer a Windows Server. As a software developer, the benefit of installing Custom Servers, Web Applications and the integration of Client/Server applications which is PC related makes it attractive.

Also since I have been using Windows based RAD developers such as Borland Delphi, it makes it an easier transition rather than to learn a new scripting language as such perl or php.

For C/S applications, as most people are still using Windows as their operating system, it makes it easier to develop.

Windows hosting isn't all that bad. Sure which the price of hosting would fall though.

Servstra-Sales
07-16-2002, 04:16 AM
Originally posted by Skie
i'd go for freeBSD or netBSD over linux, but its all UNIX, and reasonably the same. so my votes for linux.

i wouldn't use a Windows server unless I had something specific to do on Windows, which I do currently (SQL2K/.NET). Try to find a *NIX host that has Oracle or something installed :rolleyes:

I couldn't agree more. :)

JamRover
07-16-2002, 06:06 AM
I prefer to use Linux, however I'm considering purchasing a Windows server for those customers who love SQL Server and ASP...since ASP isnt real on Linux.

Rudi
07-16-2002, 10:11 AM
Originally posted by wheaties_box
Linux rox

Later this year I'll buy a new computer and guess what will be on it as OS?... Yes, Linux!
Many people I know change their OS from Windows to Linux.

MotleyFool
07-16-2002, 10:30 AM
I'd say neither!

For those who have enjoyed FreeBSD and its stable rock solid TCP/IP stack and outstanding process management, Linux is a distant second and as for Windows, well the less said about it the better...

With Windows, security means the guy in the entrance with the uniform! :)

FreeBSD all the way!!

peachtreewebworks
07-16-2002, 01:00 PM
Windows is still a necessary evil for clients who have sites developed in ASP and SQL Server. Many corporations still have Windows as their main platform, and thus, their intRAnet sites are ASP/SQL Server based.

Artemido
07-16-2002, 01:20 PM
Originally posted by gadget
Windows is still a necessary evil for clients who have sites developed in ASP and SQL Server. Many corporations still have Windows as their main platform, and thus, their intRAnet sites are ASP/SQL Server based. Though even M$ will tell you that ASP is a legacy technology and that we should be putting all our web development eggs into the XML basket...