Web Hosting Talk







View Full Version : AcuNett down for hours...


mas3000
07-05-2002, 03:30 PM
I've been trying to get to AcuNett's website since 12:30PM and it's still down at 2:23PM. Is this usual for AcuNett? I was looking at them...

AcuNett
07-05-2002, 03:54 PM
The server acunett is on had hardware problems. Rackshack is replacing the HD.

Brin_AcuNett
07-06-2002, 07:37 PM
Everything is back in working order now. :)

AcuNett
07-07-2002, 12:06 AM
err Brian, it was back in order 24 hours ago ;). Keep up with the times will ya.

Aussie Bob
07-07-2002, 12:14 AM
Originally posted by AcuNett
err Brian, it was back in order 24 hours ago ;). Keep up with the times will ya.
Yes :D I was wondering about the 28hr delay there :D

RRolfe
07-07-2002, 12:17 AM
better late than never :)

chrisb
07-07-2002, 03:53 AM
mas3000, I don't think your thread title is fair. You say "down for hours" leaving a false impressions that Accunet has been down for 6 hours or more. According to you, they hadn't even been down 2 hours before you posted this.

I see you replying to hosting offers here so it makes me wonder if you are just a competitor bashing another host.

Aussie Bob
07-07-2002, 04:23 AM
Originally posted by chrisb
mas3000, I don't think your thread title is fair. You say "down for hours" leaving a false impressions that Accunet has been down for 6 hours or more. According to you, they hadn't even been down 2 hours before you posted this.
Well, 2 hours is "hours", although I agree with what you're saying chrisb.
I see you replying to hosting offers here so it makes me wonder if you are just a competitor bashing another host. [/B]
Agreed also. Let's leave the server down threads to their clients and not their competitors, hey?? :)

iamdave
07-07-2002, 04:31 AM
mas3000, why were you trying to access their site for so long? Don't you have your own hosting "operation?"

chrisb
07-07-2002, 06:20 AM
Now, "that's" a good question, iamdave! I'd like to hear the answer to that.

Bob, "for hours" is usually used as an exaggeration just like "for days" which leads people to believe it's been a long time - 4hrs, 6hrs, half a day, most of the day?

Nonetheless, according to mass3000, he posted this when it had been less than 2 hours, so it wasn't "hours".

Accunet just seem like nice people, and I hate to see them wrongly slammed.

Aussie Bob
07-07-2002, 06:24 AM
Originally posted by chrisb
Bob, "for hours" is usually used as an exaggeration just like "for days" which leads people to believe it's been a long time - 4hrs, 6hrs, half a day, most of the day?
Yes. I know. That's whay I said -
I agree with what you're saying chrisb.
:)