I'm interested in hearing from people who have used both MB and WHMCS for their hosting companies. Why did you switch from one to the other? Putting price aside, what is it about WHMCS or Modernbill that made you choose that solution over the other?

Do a search first, I guarantee you will find your question answered that way.

Matt will treat you right with WHMCS! I have not yet had one problem with them that wasn't fixed within 24 hours. The interface and installation is so much easier than modern bill and alot faster in my opinion. There are also a lot of features in WHMCS including its own support system so you don't have to go get Kayako also.

GO WHMCS you won't regret it.

Matt will treat you right with WHMCS! I have not yet had one problem with them that wasn't fixed within 24 hours. The interface and installation is so much easier than modern bill and alot faster in my opinion. There are also a lot of features in WHMCS including its own support system so you don't have to go get Kayako also.

GO WHMCS you won't regret it.

Yes, but there's things about MB that will make some deal with the BS to use it(like myself).

WHMCS is money worth spending i have brought this system and many other but i have to say WHMCS is far by the best

Thanks. I did a search and have been reading through the various threads. Does anyone know if there is a comprehensive list of features that WHMCS offers that MB does not and vice versa?