DynastyHost
06-29-2002, 09:42 PM
Does anyone know of a good NIC for a server?
![]() | View Full Version : Nic DynastyHost 06-29-2002, 09:42 PM Does anyone know of a good NIC for a server? NixHosting 06-29-2002, 09:43 PM Intel or 3com is pretty much all i would use on a production server. For my local network I use just about all linksys. DynastyHost 06-29-2002, 09:47 PM Thanks Nix... Any particular model? NixHosting 06-29-2002, 09:49 PM Pretty much anything that's 10/100 or if you are on a giga network get a giga card. Most likely you are on a basic 10/100. DynastyHost 06-29-2002, 09:50 PM This is for my home network server :) I "dont'" think it's a giga network :) NixHosting 06-29-2002, 09:53 PM Oh if it's for a home network then grab a linksys 10/100 The model number is lne100tx . They are good cards. I have a few here that I been using for like 4 years without fail. Their like $20 at compusa and stuff. They have WOL (wake on lan) which allows the computer to boot up when it detects network activity. Your motherboard must support this technology. But even if it don't the WOL is just an option. FDrive 06-29-2002, 10:09 PM Originally posted by NixHosting The model number is lne100tx I'm using a Linksys LNE100TX, haven't had any problems with it. Abu Mami 06-30-2002, 02:32 AM I made a post about NICs somewhere on WHT a few days ago (perhaps in the "technical and security" section?)... Anyhow, about a year ago I was involved in some heavy testing of NICs under Linux and the results showed that Intel and 3Com are the best. Using the standard (?) Linux driver (written by Becker), the Intel exhibited strange behaviour when completely loaded. Its interrupt processing went crazy and the card just choked, resulting in low throughput and lost packets. However, when using the new driver supplied by Intel, the card was a real barn burner. The Intel driver uploads some patches to the NICs firmware which corrects the interrupt processing bugs. This is something that Becker couldn't handle since Intel keeps this information a secret. My recommendation... use an Intel NIC along with the Intel driver. Second choice would be 3Com. BTW - I can't imagine any server being subjected to the load that I created for testing purposes. But it's nice to know that there's a safety margin. markblair 06-30-2002, 03:17 AM Originally posted by FDrive I'm using a Linksys LNE100TX, haven't had any problems with it. That makes three of us... :D Very good cards. I've only had problems with DLink in the past. Linksys has always made good network cards. DynastyHost 06-30-2002, 03:25 AM Originally posted by Abu Mami I made a post about NICs somewhere on WHT a few days ago (perhaps in the "technical and security" section?)... Anyhow, about a year ago I was involved in some heavy testing of NICs under Linux and the results showed that Intel and 3Com are the best. Using the standard (?) Linux driver (written by Becker), the Intel exhibited strange behaviour when completely loaded. Its interrupt processing went crazy and the card just choked, resulting in low throughput and lost packets. However, when using the new driver supplied by Intel, the card was a real barn burner. The Intel driver uploads some patches to the NICs firmware which corrects the interrupt processing bugs. This is something that Becker couldn't handle since Intel keeps this information a secret. My recommendation... use an Intel NIC along with the Intel driver. Second choice would be 3Com. BTW - I can't imagine any server being subjected to the load that I created for testing purposes. But it's nice to know that there's a safety margin. Thank you! This is just what I'm looking for in this post. Abu Mami 06-30-2002, 06:33 AM Originally posted by DynastyHost Thank you! This is just what I'm looking for in this post. No problem, just keep in mind that all the standard disclaimers apply... your mileage may vary, wash colors separately, apply sunscreen. |