Web Hosting Talk







View Full Version : Help Me Rank These Hosts


capetown
05-29-2002, 02:52 PM
Hello All,

Can I have 5 seconds of your time:)

I Have it down to a few hosts and need assistance
in ranking them.

Please indicate on a scale of 1 to 10 what you think
OVERALL of each of these hosts or the hosts you
have had experience with.

Be brutally honest here in your ranking. If one or more
of the below hosts are absolute a@@holes...please
let us ALL know.


DialUp Host
Akashik
Hosting Matters
TechArk
Insider Hosting

Chicken
05-29-2002, 03:43 PM
Well, you can search for some of these and find comments already posted on the forum. I'm not sure what the value of having people rate hosts they've had no experience with (seems rather pointless and just about the worst way I can think of on how to pick a host, sans just choosing the top one off a paid top25 list). If you don't find comments about a particular host here, you should search elsewhere. Sometimes no news is good news, so no comments might not be a bad thing.

capetown
05-29-2002, 04:31 PM
Chicken,

I want fresh info...not historical info.

What I have learned with Avail is that these hosts (especially
in the current economic environment) change daily.

A host might have been great 4 months ago, but now due to poor revenue and poor employee moral might be awful.

The ranking will help me in my own way Chicken. I dont want a lot of fluff...just a number.

So with that said ....can you guys reply with any rankings of the
hosts you are FAMILIAR with....5 seconds of your time...thats all I need. :)

DialUp Host
Akashik
Hosting Matters
TechArk
Insider Hosting

UmBillyCord
05-29-2002, 04:54 PM
I dont want a lot of fluff...just a number.


DialUp Host = "3.14......" Basically pi.
Akashik = "-(-) 500"
Hosting Matters = 1x-3y = 4(2)
TechArk = For this I would use Bernoulli's equation. More information found here:
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/bern.html
Insider Hosting - 0%. Give or take a few 100%.

Hope these help.

jtm2001
05-29-2002, 05:31 PM
capetown,

Sorry to see we have some very unprofessional people on this board...

Good luck in your search for a good host. Maybe after you have posted a couple THOUSAND times you will earn some respect.

UmBillyCord
05-29-2002, 05:40 PM
Originally posted by jtm2001
capetown,

Sorry to see we have some very unprofessional people on this board...

Good luck in your search for a good host. Maybe after you have posted a couple THOUSAND times you will earn some respect.

:bawling:

A newbie with no sense of humor. Thanks for stopping by. I always love the references to post count from fools like you. I give you a 0 out of 10 - and that is giving you some leadway..... :cartman:

capetown, if you want more advise, list what you are looking for. Ex.. rate them 1 out of 10 -against each other?. Rate them in service and support. Give them two thumbs up. Etc... What criteria are you looking for? Service vs support vs. price.

As Chicken pointed out, it seems very vague.

jtm2001
05-29-2002, 05:42 PM
Brother,

As I said "unprofessional."

Sorry you resort to such lango....

:bawling:

UmBillyCord
05-29-2002, 05:45 PM
Originally posted by jtm2001
Brother,

As I said "unprofessional."

Sorry you resort to such lango....

:bawling:

Let me guess. You are using a new user name and you are some cry baby I was brutally honest with before????? Can I call you "the poster formally known as.... ":rolleyes:

PS - we are not brothers and we sure are not friends. Also, your ~5 post per day is still 3 more then my two a day. Fool.....

jtm2001
05-29-2002, 05:48 PM
I struck a nerve... I LIKE IT.

Easy to get you upset...

You made my day... This fool is going to make a drink to celebrate....

P.S. You can call me anything you like...

UmBillyCord
05-29-2002, 05:51 PM
I struck a nerve... I LIKE IT.

Well don't break out the lotion and happy sock just yet.....


Mat, are you a Troll???

Two post that you bash on other host.

http://webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?threadid=52102


http://webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?threadid=51799

SoftWareRevue
05-29-2002, 06:01 PM
*A-HEM!


What's this thread about again?

Like Chicken said; probably not the best way to go about it.

Like UBC said; probably not the best way to go about it.

Like jtm said; err . . . uhh . . . never mind what he said
I'll, no doubt, earn a reply about post counts from him.
Go ahead, please.

mdrussell
05-29-2002, 06:03 PM
Originally posted by jtm2001
capetown,

Sorry to see we have some very unprofessional people on this board...

Good luck in your search for a good host. Maybe after you have posted a couple THOUSAND times you will earn some respect.

I have to disagree, UmBillyCord's sense of humour is great - makes reading WHT much more entertaining.

The "toy cars" post was a killer :D :beer:

SoftWareRevue
05-29-2002, 06:07 PM
Originally posted by voxtreme-matt


I have to disagree, UmBillyCord's sense of humour is great - makes reading WHT much more entertaining.

The "toy cars" post was a killer :D :beer: I totally agree. :) (about your disagreeing)

He has been quite humorous of late. And I always find humor a refreshing break from the bickering we often see on this board.

I still say, we need a hosting humor section. :D

mdrussell
05-29-2002, 06:09 PM
It would be a good idea... although I don't think any mod_gzip jokes should be allowed :rolleyes:

jtm2001
05-29-2002, 06:13 PM
<<<Mat, are you a Troll???>>>>


Now THAT's FUNNY!!!!

Sorry guys... I've got work to do.. got to go. It has been fun... And again, I hope captain does find his host and billy cord continues to be funny... stand up comedy is not a bad job... but I don't know if a monitor will hold 'em?

SoftWareRevue
05-29-2002, 06:24 PM
Originally posted by voxtreme-matt
It would be a good idea... although I don't think any mod_gzip jokes should be allowed :rolleyes: Now that was funny. :D


errr . . . what it was in reference to. :)

capetown
05-29-2002, 08:23 PM
How in the heck did a flame war start from a simple question?

I PURPOSELY wanted a simple answer to my question on ranking the hosts I mentioned...dont start a flame war because there is a topic that you dont like or cant comprehend.

Some of you are very immature. I am getting the feeling that
a large proportion of the posters here on WHT are still a bit wet behind the ears.

As fo my post count and being a "newbie"etc etc...I dont care. Lets compare dollars in bank and brokerage accounts or square footage in a house or corporate suite to get my attention.

UmBillyCord
05-29-2002, 08:40 PM
Relax.... I think the only thing stupid [Note to readers - he edited his post after calling everyone stupid - it now doesn't say it] was your request for a ranking with no intelligent criteria. Here are 5 apples. Rank them 1 - 10. Sorry my sense of humor was missed. I will make sure to add tons of smilies next time. Here is one now - :D. Here is one for later - :D.


As fo my post count and being a "newbie"etc etc...I dont care. Lets compare dollars in bank and brokerage accounts or square footage in a house or corporate suite to get my attention.

How old are you should be the question? I will admit my sometimes immature attempts at humor are not the best. But your reply....

PS - If you throw in the size of your pea brain - I'll take challange from above. With all that money and big house, you are still a child who needs a hand held when choosing a $10.00 web host. Take my hand. I'll help you rank host, cars, lollipops, and even Disney films!!!

microsol
05-29-2002, 09:53 PM
Haha, that's going to be funny :D

Chicken
05-29-2002, 10:11 PM
Originally posted by jtm2001
Good luck in your search for a good host. Maybe after you have posted a couple THOUSAND times you will earn some respect.
Whether you have posted 1 time, 100 times, or 10,000 times, if the question is so flawed that members cannot possibly reasonably answer it, then people can't answer it.

Welcome to try for round two, however questions need to be structured in such a manner that an answer can be given. Seems obvious, however often times people post vague questions which either cannot be answered or threads in which the results are useless.