I saw Yahoo dedicated server (servers.yahoo.com) offers Raq4/64mb = $99 only . My questions :
- 64mb enough for 30 domains estimate?
- PHP4 and MySQL can running on Raq4 with 64mb only?
- What different Raq4i with Raq4?
- Who already have Raq4 on there?
- How about Yahoo server Customer Support?

For webserving, the most important is the RAM.
I have a RaQ4r, 512MB RAM, dual 40GB RAID1.

If you ask me...
it is NOT enough...
but...
ask them to put 512 in it?

Better still get in touch with my provider hostmaster@pronicsolutions.com
for good deal and great support.

www.serverrack.net would be a much better choice over yahoo. for real.

or, pronic of course.

or:

www.rackshack.net
www.4webspace.com

yes, 4webspace would be a wiser choice than yahoo...

Well for 99 $ @ rackshack you get 10X better RAQ offer :)

interactive = you are not alowed to do selfpromotion read the rules, otherwise you could get into trouble with the mods

Yes, as Fiber Optic put it, 512 mb is not enough. I definately agree..........

I think the Cobalt should have made a server with 4 slots instead of 2 and up to 2 GB of ram. ECC ram would be nice too.

In fact I mean 512 is a minimum for me since RAM is important for webservers.

But 64MB....
Well, it might be enough for hosting the webite of your pets :)

I have a RaQ 4i w/ 256 mb ram and 80+ sites that I have developed. Static HTML with some cgi/perl - nothing fancy; mainly travel sites getting 150,000+ unique visitors per month. So far everything has been fine with this "limited" ram. (I started with a RaQ2 and 32 mb.) If I were running dynamic sites (databased) I would need more ram, but so far - so good.

Be careful with Yahoo RaQs - I looked at them but did not like the bandwidth offering - seemed rather limited for throughput. But, then again, what do I know? - I do most of my development on a Mac...:stickout

-