Web Hosting Talk







View Full Version : CC Processors


Little_Pixel
05-17-2002, 12:13 PM
Hello,

I am looking for a Credit Card Processor but I would like to use it for more than one thing, I want to accept payments by it for selling ebooks and let clients pay me buy it for my design company. Is this possible. I would like it to also be able to charge people in different currencies and get paid in Ģ's. Is there any out like this for under $50 set up charge, also I dont want to be charged for monthly statments or any other monthly fees.

Thank you.

ho247
05-17-2002, 12:24 PM
You might want to look at http://www.revecom.com/ they have a setup of $49 and they have the features you're looking for, including getting paid in GBP.

Alan

Angel78
05-17-2002, 01:24 PM
But keep in mind that ravecom doesnot send checks = you have to have a business account with your bank ( = ltd)

big_smooth
05-17-2002, 02:28 PM
Revecom does send checks.

trustedurl.com
05-17-2002, 03:30 PM
Stay as far away from revecom as you can. They seem to have a systematic error in their system and they provide NO solution for it. (Clients being charged and then receiving messages that they weren't charged and that their card was declined. Calling support results in "We cannot see the charge in our system, therefore it didn't happen..." though it does appear on the lcients card!)

Do a search on this board...

if all is okay, then revecom works fine....
if something goes wrong, then they blow...

my 2 c!

(I use 2checkout, so far so good, hostcharge looks good too)

Phil@OneAust
05-20-2002, 03:15 PM
I use www.2checkout.com

tomfra
08-05-2002, 06:42 PM
Does anyone know about a site with an independent review of 3rd party credit card processors?

Tomas

megagente
08-08-2002, 10:35 AM
I saw one, I donīt remember the name. There was not too much content and that site looks more like a referal. Not much to trust.

DotComster
08-08-2002, 05:57 PM
This is one of the best CC thread I have seen here:

http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=486754#post486754