Web Hosting Talk







View Full Version : Easiest to admin...WHM or ensim?


Frosty
05-09-2002, 04:00 AM
If i`ve never had a dedicated server before which would be easier for me to learn or mess with...WHM or Ensim? Is the admin side of WHM really that much easier than admining ensim? (i`m not talking the user control panel...but the admin control panel stuff side).

:confused: :crap:

panopticon
05-09-2002, 05:00 AM
Ensim is easy if you don't want to do anything non-standard or out of the ordinary (for example subdomains, crosslinks, multiple sites per account, etc. etc.) If you do want to do something fancy with Ensim, give yourself 1-2 weeks go understand it's ins and outs (creating a python file, restarting, resaving, etc.) to get it just right. It takes some getting used to as far as customizing Ensim, but it's doable.

diederik
05-09-2002, 07:48 AM
WHM has more options, and it updates itself automaticly ( including server software ). This is a great feature in WHM.
However, the interface of Ensim is much better and clearer.

CPanel has a great interface, but WHM isn't the best .... ( very long list of options, you have to scroll down a few pages to get something done ).

Why not take a demo of WHM & Ensim ?

phpjames
05-09-2002, 07:53 AM
Ensim is clean and easy to understand. WHM is icky and designed poorly but both have their bonuses. I just am not a fan of WHM ugly interface. Give me icons and little things to click on! ;-)

zRedDice
05-09-2002, 05:06 PM
But if you think about it... they're both backends, so "looking nice" isn't the most important thing... Its like the storage room in a store... They have concrete floors, because the only people that see it is the employees... Only what the customer sees has to look nice.

- James

porcupine
05-09-2002, 05:36 PM
Dont forget, WHM is also all text, that makes it nice and FAST to do stuff (nothing like waiting 5 minutes when admining a box remotely for pics to load) and also doo-able with a text only browser (lynx for example) or on low grade machines (consoles in a DC for example)

rbro
05-09-2002, 06:04 PM
Originally posted by zRedDice
But if you think about it... they're both backends, so "looking nice" isn't the most important thing... Its like the storage room in a store... They have concrete floors, because the only people that see it is the employees... Only what the customer sees has to look nice.

- James

Ahhh. But sometimes the reseller IS the customer. I agree about the ugly interface for WHM. They were supposed to be working on making it skinnable. Whatever happened to that?

Frosty
05-09-2002, 07:34 PM
Thanks for responding. Nevermind i think i still want cpanel. If i have cpanel and wanted to offer my resellers WHM....i would have to like disable all the "admin" features and stuff on their WHM version right? So they`d have the exact same WHM but with a bunch of crap disabled?

Jeff Booth
05-15-2002, 06:54 PM
WHM/CPANEL is far superior in my opinion.

rbro
05-15-2002, 06:57 PM
Originally posted by Frosty
Thanks for responding. Nevermind i think i still want cpanel. If i have cpanel and wanted to offer my resellers WHM....i would have to like disable all the "admin" features and stuff on their WHM version right? So they`d have the exact same WHM but with a bunch of crap disabled?

You don't have to manually disable anything. When you create a reseller account, they automatically get access to a reseller version of WHM without access to the admin features.

Frosty
05-15-2002, 07:04 PM
rbro,

Cool i see thanks. I thought i had to disable a bunch of stuff :)