Warez
05-02-2002, 01:39 AM
For those who wish to view objectively ReadyHosting's stats using EasyMonitor, here it is:
Date Time Description Duration
05.02.2002 08:32 Timeout 2 hours, 13 mins
05.02.2002 07:53 Timeout 17 mins
05.02.2002 07:13 Timeout 19 mins
05.02.2002 06:06 Timeout 15 mins
05.02.2002 03:41 Timeout 16 mins
05.01.2002 18:54 Timeout 16 mins
05.01.2002 11:57 Connection refused 14 mins
04.30.2002 14:38 Timeout 34 mins
04.28.2002 23:34 Timeout 47 mins
04.25.2002 15:57 Connection refused 11 mins
04.11.2002 14:28 Timeout 1 hour, 32 mins
04.11.2002 13:37 HTTP Error 500 Server Error 15 mins
04.10.2002 23:20 Connection refused 15 mins
04.09.2002 16:49 HTTP Error 403 Access Forbidden 15 mins
BTW, this is a log for only 2 days. It's a *very* common occurence weekly, if not daily.
punaboy
05-02-2002, 05:20 AM
:puke:http://www.webhostingratings.com/plans/ReadyHosting.html
Warez
05-02-2002, 10:00 AM
Thanks, no more arguments about who is good or not. This one clearly sucks *BIG* time.
Warez
05-02-2002, 06:34 PM
Just curious, how can a host so bad be on CNET's top 3 list?
UmBillyCord
05-02-2002, 07:41 PM
Originally posted by Warez
Just curious, how can a host so bad be on CNET's top 3 list?
This is the biggest BS on their page. CNet judges "Most Popular" by the amount of clicks you get. NOTHING more. So of course some cheap host will get more clicks and appear *more popular*.
Infinology.com are the biggest false advertisers that knowing lie to customers about this so called popularity. Read their press:
http://www.infinology.com/whycnet.htm
Incognito
05-02-2002, 09:07 PM
That's not for two days. It covers the period from April 9 - May 2. So, it covers 24 days.
Second, I have found with easymonitor, if it only shows one down time (15 minutes on 15 minute monitoring), it generally wasn't down, but just a connectivity problem somewhere along the line.
However, even considering all the times, their uptime is 98.8% and I would suspect a truer measurement would be more like 99.3%. Either way not great, but not as bad as it would be if it was a two day period and certainly not among the worst out there.
Warez
05-07-2002, 01:34 AM
Originally posted by Incognito
That's not for two days. It covers the period from April 9 - May 2. So, it covers 24 days.
Second, I have found with easymonitor, if it only shows one down time (15 minutes on 15 minute monitoring), it generally wasn't down, but just a connectivity problem somewhere along the line.
However, even considering all the times, their uptime is 98.8% and I would suspect a truer measurement would be more like 99.3%. Either way not great, but not as bad as it would be if it was a two day period and certainly not among the worst out there.
It's quite bad actually, only thing that EasyMonitor keeps the last 10 logs.
05.07.2002 06:25 Timeout 56 mins
05.07.2002 04:13 Timeout 17 mins
05.06.2002 21:50 Timeout 16 mins
05.06.2002 19:04 HTTP Error 500 Internal Server Error 16 mins
05.06.2002 15:48 HTTP Error 403 Access Forbidden 19 mins
05.06.2002 14:08 HTTP Error 500 Internal Server Error 17 mins
05.02.2002 08:32 Timeout 2 hours, 13 mins
05.02.2002 07:53 Timeout 17 mins
05.02.2002 07:13 Timeout 19 mins
05.02.2002 06:06 Timeout 15 mins
05.02.2002 03:41 Timeout 16 mins
05.01.2002 18:54 Timeout 16 mins
05.01.2002 11:57 Connection refused 14 mins
04.30.2002 14:38 Timeout 34 mins
04.28.2002 23:34 Timeout 47 mins
04.25.2002 15:57 Connection refused 11 mins
04.11.2002 14:28 Timeout 1 hour, 32 mins
04.11.2002 13:37 HTTP Error 500 Server Error 15 mins
04.10.2002 23:20 Connection refused 15 mins
04.09.2002 16:49 HTTP Error 403 Access Forbidden 15 mins
