which option would you go with between these two?
and why?
imagine you want to run one huge hosting setup which one would do best from A - Z and if including billing stuff too if any , and if not what software can run the show for such huge setup
something like powweb.com
considering your users will move from cPanel what most convenient for them to switch To
dynamicnet
01-12-2006, 10:48 AM
Greetings:
This June will be our eleventh year in business, and by November, ten of them in pure Internet services.
In those years, we've found end users could care less about who makes the end user control panel as long as they can easily do what they need to do.
That stated, we've been using H-Sphere for several years now; and continue to believe it to be the most economical, lower total cost of ownership solution for complete automation of hosting.
Thank you.
wow 7 votes to null?
no one ever tried interworx or what?
Peter does H-sphere supports multiple servers setup and expansion of adding more and more servers easily?
Walter
01-15-2006, 05:38 AM
Peter does H-sphere supports multiple servers setup and expansion of adding more and more servers easily?
Yes.
Take a look at http://www.psoft.net/h_sphere2_info.html
thewebhostingdir
01-15-2006, 06:10 AM
Hi,
We're in this business since last 5 years. We've 2 powerful cluster of helm servers and their performance is excellent.
We have never tried any other control panel for windows server.
dynamicnet
01-15-2006, 01:49 PM
Greetings:
Yes, new servers can be added to the cluster with ease.
Unix servers typically take five to no more than fifteen minutes to add, and Window 200x servers fifteen to no more than thirty minutes to add to the cluster.
Thank you.
Kiamori
01-15-2006, 05:19 PM
H-Sphere for nix, HostingAccelerator for windows