Web Hosting Talk







View Full Version : SMS Service Status


Doyley
12-06-2005, 04:49 AM
Hi Guys,

Im thinking of adding a SMS service status option for my customers. Basically something along the lines of either, if something goes wrong they get a sms or, they get sms every now and again assuring them the server is ok...something like that.
Now im sure I can manage to code something locally but im not sure of how to send the message.
Do I need to sign up with someone and pay them a subscription to use a gateway of somesort?

Many thanks

Burhan
12-06-2005, 05:27 AM
Yes, you will need to sign up with a SMS gateway provider. They will give you documentation in the form of an API that will allow you to interface with their systems in your application to send messages.

Generally, you buy bulk messages (like say 100 SMS messages) and refill your account when you run out. Some also provide subscription services.

One gateway provider that I have worked with before is Click A Tell (http://www.clickatell.com).

rootsupport
12-06-2005, 08:35 AM
You can search on google with the string "sms gateway provider".

Doyley
12-07-2005, 02:10 PM
OK thanks guys

Doyley
12-07-2005, 02:11 PM
Oh, is the technology easy to integrate?

Carp
12-07-2005, 02:48 PM
SMS is always good, however, there is an alternative. Usually a customers phone will have a direct email address.

like if you have a verizon customer, their email is XXXXXXXXXX@vtext.com and they will get that on their phone.

I used to have a list of like 8 wireless provider email's but it's on my other computer which is currently 2 hours away

innova
12-07-2005, 03:09 PM
Sorry to hijack this thread, but I have wondered this for awhile...

What is the difference between going the SMS route versus email? What are the costs and limitations associated with each?

I have always used the email-to-phone route in the past - there is no burden on the sender this way. Anyone care to comment?

iffology
12-07-2005, 08:49 PM
Using an SMS gateway usually produces extra costs for the sender, but no complications for the receiver. Using mail function produces no extra costs for the sender, but sometimes the reciever must go through extra hassle to get the notice (some providers require users to send an SMS to receive the actual message) and/or extra costs (some providers ask monthly fee for this).
As for technical aspect, sending an email is definately simpler. But gateways usually provide a simple way of connecting their server from within a script, sometimes even with examples in different scripting languages (PHP, ASP, Perl).

Burhan
12-08-2005, 02:23 AM
In addition, there are only a few companies that provide this email-to-phone feature; I am not 100% sure, but I believe it is only available in the US. Elsewhere, where GSM service is widespread, SMS and MMS are the way to go.

Atleast where I live, there is no cost to the reciever of the SMS message, only the sender.

brianoz
12-08-2005, 09:27 AM
Try clickatell.com - one of the cheapest providers I've found, and their service seems reasonable and very flexible. They have a whole variety of ways you can connect - via SMTP, SNPP, and HTTP, plus others I think.

iffology
12-10-2005, 12:10 PM
At least in my country, every provider has email-to-SMS feature. But it costs. Although fyrestrtr is right, use SMS, it's more reliable and the receiving the notice requires no client interaction.