UH-Matt
10-25-2005, 08:11 AM
Does anybody know what webmail software names.co.uk uses?
See:
http://www.names.co.uk/cms_content/shared_assets/_new_sites/control_panel_tour/web_mail01lrg.jpg
It looks lovely and I assume they have taken an existing software and skinned it... any ideas?
What else comes close to this?
We currently use squirrelmail but a lot of clients seem to want something a lot better?
nafrance
10-25-2005, 08:25 AM
Looks like a custom job - their press release page (Google cached) confirmed this...although that may well be a lie ;)
My first thoughts were that it was Squirrelmail with a skin, but I can't tell without getting a login.
www.nutsmail.com have some very, very nice skins for SM that make it a lot nicer looking, for very little cash.
Dan L
10-25-2005, 01:49 PM
http://www.icewarp.com/Products/Merak_WebMail/index.html Probably the slickest option around, but it costs quite a bit.
Do you know what your clients want in particular?
UH-Matt
10-25-2005, 08:23 PM
The names.co.uk one look a lot like:
http://ilohamail.org/main.php?page=ScreenShots
Agree?
pztup
10-25-2005, 08:42 PM
Could be a number of scripts with a custom template (: But it sort of looks like ihoamail.
Might mean nothing but I use RoundCube, http://www.roundcube.net/
KNL-BSW
10-25-2005, 09:06 PM
To be honest what that reminded me of was an older version of the MailEnable Webmail. They've since updated there skins, but that skin might still be around.
Bashar
10-26-2005, 08:42 PM
Matt,
you like Gmail with more features? check this out http://www.zimbra.com/screenshots/ its a kille rand its my target in future t oswitch to
i tested almost every software out there and currently use atmail.com
in regards for names.co.uk i'm sure i've happen to see this interface before but not really sure which one is lt, by anychance its windows app?
UH-Matt
10-27-2005, 06:47 PM
Thanks Basher,
That looks like really nice webmail!
atmail was something I was considering... but would run to several thousands of dollars a year for our users... a little bit steap for a feature that less than half would actually use.