Champenois
06-16-2005, 11:24 PM
Could a few people give me their thoughts about the reasonableness of this?
I have been a Dathorn customer for a little under 2 years. To the best of my knowledge my account has always been paid on time, and operated well within their TOS. A model customer? :)
I have up until now been happy with their service.
On the 14th (last Tuesday) a Dathorn forum alert, and an email from Andrew were sent to me. They announced a doubling of disc space offer, for a processing fee of $5, and expiring that night.
However I live in Hong Kong, and spend three and a half days of every week on the Chinese mainland, and had just left as usual the day before, so I missed the offer.
Nothing that unusual huh? However, I was a bit uneasy about an offer that expires so quickly, and also figuring I had an unusual case, wrote to Andrew last night (on my return) to see if he would reconsider and apply the offer still, as it was something I could use right now.
The unusual case? - there aren't many countries which police and restrict internet use like the authorities on the Chinese mainland do. My 3&1/2 days a week, every week on the mainland is spent in a city of 8 million people where internet cafes are banned by law. That's why I don't get to check my email for that part of the week.
In spite of detailing the circumstances, the blanket, short and sweet answer from Andrew was "Sorry, the offer has expired." Hmmm, well I tried, end of story right?
This morning I was looking around this forum, and I see the offer from Andrew was actually posted here on the 8th, (Shared and Reseller Hosting Offers) some 6 days earlier. Here is where the "uneasy" part gets answered !
The only conclusion I could come to is that the offer was actually a new customer drive, and for commercial reasons was offered tightly "clipped" to existing customers.
The forum alert posting (dathorn forum) was not read to the last post by me last night before I wrote to Andrew. On re-reading it this morning, the last poster (Andrew) informed everyone that if they missed the opportunity, not to try "begging" :o
Obviously I am now a beggar ! (well I'm in the right country for 3 days a week for that activity !)
The questions, after this long-winded story where I need some comments from experienced people are:
- Does everyone think this is a reasonable and fair practice to discriminate against loyal clients by offering new clients the same account with vastly better terms, giving the existing client a crippled opportunity to catch up?
- Is this the start of a situation with Dathorn that I have personally witnessed numerous times in the hosting industry, where once a company gets established, their attitudes and policies start to harden, a touch of arrogance starts to creep in, and that formerly "precious" customer becomes an expendable item?
Do any Hosting companies, after becoming successful, manage to remember how they got that far, and actually quantify the value of a model customer versus the opposite?
Any enlightening posts in reply are appreciated.
Thanks, John
ps - BTW - my references to internet restrictions on the Chinese mainland are a statement of fact - not criticism
I have been a Dathorn customer for a little under 2 years. To the best of my knowledge my account has always been paid on time, and operated well within their TOS. A model customer? :)
I have up until now been happy with their service.
On the 14th (last Tuesday) a Dathorn forum alert, and an email from Andrew were sent to me. They announced a doubling of disc space offer, for a processing fee of $5, and expiring that night.
However I live in Hong Kong, and spend three and a half days of every week on the Chinese mainland, and had just left as usual the day before, so I missed the offer.
Nothing that unusual huh? However, I was a bit uneasy about an offer that expires so quickly, and also figuring I had an unusual case, wrote to Andrew last night (on my return) to see if he would reconsider and apply the offer still, as it was something I could use right now.
The unusual case? - there aren't many countries which police and restrict internet use like the authorities on the Chinese mainland do. My 3&1/2 days a week, every week on the mainland is spent in a city of 8 million people where internet cafes are banned by law. That's why I don't get to check my email for that part of the week.
In spite of detailing the circumstances, the blanket, short and sweet answer from Andrew was "Sorry, the offer has expired." Hmmm, well I tried, end of story right?
This morning I was looking around this forum, and I see the offer from Andrew was actually posted here on the 8th, (Shared and Reseller Hosting Offers) some 6 days earlier. Here is where the "uneasy" part gets answered !
The only conclusion I could come to is that the offer was actually a new customer drive, and for commercial reasons was offered tightly "clipped" to existing customers.
The forum alert posting (dathorn forum) was not read to the last post by me last night before I wrote to Andrew. On re-reading it this morning, the last poster (Andrew) informed everyone that if they missed the opportunity, not to try "begging" :o
Obviously I am now a beggar ! (well I'm in the right country for 3 days a week for that activity !)
The questions, after this long-winded story where I need some comments from experienced people are:
- Does everyone think this is a reasonable and fair practice to discriminate against loyal clients by offering new clients the same account with vastly better terms, giving the existing client a crippled opportunity to catch up?
- Is this the start of a situation with Dathorn that I have personally witnessed numerous times in the hosting industry, where once a company gets established, their attitudes and policies start to harden, a touch of arrogance starts to creep in, and that formerly "precious" customer becomes an expendable item?
Do any Hosting companies, after becoming successful, manage to remember how they got that far, and actually quantify the value of a model customer versus the opposite?
Any enlightening posts in reply are appreciated.
Thanks, John
ps - BTW - my references to internet restrictions on the Chinese mainland are a statement of fact - not criticism
