Go ahead and tell me which one of both you prefer. :)

We're setting up our new site and would like to hear what your reasons are for chosing the one or the other.

Also I would like to know if there are other content management systems out there that are PHP-MySQL based. You can vote 'Other Content Management System' and tell us which one + why you chose that one.

Thanks for your votes and replies! :D
Don't forget to say WHY!!;)

PHP Nuke is less secure than Windows. Post Nuke I hear is good.

I'm currently using postnuke and haven't had any major problems with it.

XOOPS looks promising, but it's still too early to tell.

I am very pleased with PHP-Nuke, but have not tried Post-Nuke, so I can't really say which is better.

prefer mambo and ezpublish myself.

and yes Xoops looks promosing right now too.

'The Nukes', while quite modular just aren't an arractive looking CMS in my opinion

Greg Moore

I'm a current user of php-nuke and I like it. But it fits the purpose of my site. I might do a test drive post-nuke to see what its about.

Since I havent used anything but php-nuke, I cant vote here yet.


'The Nukes', while quite modular just aren't an arractive looking CMS in my opinion


I can agree with you here. Since it is 'free' you shouldnt expect too much, besides you get what you pay for, But you also get out of it what you put in ;)

PHP-Nuke - easy to work with and modify - bugs U can usaully fix quickly. 5.5 is working

POSTNUKE - Testing on one site - a few problems and I would recommend waiting and look at next release do out soon.

If I had to choose from thos two PostNuke but if I could choose somethigng slse i'd go with myPHP-Nuke (http://www.myphpnuke.com)

BTW:
I myself use PostNuke on several sites and I'm very happy with it. :)
But as Fish_Saver already said; there are always some bugs you need to work out by yourself, and their support chatroom sucks (but that's normal; it's a free service ;))

...voilà.