One of the best UDRP decisions I've had the pleasure of reading
from my email:

http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2004/d2004_0964.html

Just thought I'd post about it here for you guys to read. Enjoy!

I'm glad to see that WIPO does not always favor the trademark holder, especially when the trademark was obtained in bad faith.

Originally posted by ajaspers
I'm glad to see that WIPO does not always favor the trademark holder, especially when the trademark was obtained in bad faith.

That's why it's best to use 3 panelists instead of just one, if you
noted how many presided over the proceeding. There's always
the possibility one might rule in favor of the complainant, but the
other 2 can still decide in favor of the respondent.

Good thing this one is unanimous. :)