theguy
02-02-2002, 10:15 AM
is it cheaper or more expensive than a linux server?
![]() | View Full Version : what's the going rate for a shared win2000 server account theguy 02-02-2002, 10:15 AM is it cheaper or more expensive than a linux server? kmb999 02-02-2002, 12:24 PM I think you need to clarify as to whether you are talking about a shared hosting account or a dedicated server, but in either case Windows is usually more expensive and not as good as Linux. avara 02-02-2002, 01:04 PM While I'm generalizing here, usually Windows-based hosting is more expensive, for a number of reasons: 1. Software is far more expensive 2. Requires more maintenance 3. Upgrades often cost money theguy 02-02-2002, 03:35 PM shared account. i think i mentioned that in the subject how much does it cost per month. a friend of mine is paying 600$ a year and it seems a bit expensive for only 10mb hard drive Skie 02-02-2002, 03:55 PM $600 a year works out to $50/month, or thereabouts, which is rediculous for a 10 meg hard drive. You can get a virtual server for $50/month, with a 1 gig hard drive, lotsa ram, full scripting, and everything... . priyadi 02-03-2002, 02:52 AM Windows hosting are generally more expensive for several reason: - Windows o/s is very expensive - higher hardware requirement - higher maintenance cost - 3rd party software usually cost more in Windows |