Has anybody else noticed Splash Host's new website? Or am I just a bit late in noticing? :)

It's a great improvement. Well done to Alan!

I just had a look......
and yeah, it looks heaps better now........

Oh yes, the site looks really good :)

Good? I think not.. just try to view it with Netscape 4.x :D ;)

Who in there right mind would still be using Netscrape 4 ?

I pitty the foo's :stickout

Yeah! good design....

But, did you notice a major change in their policy from "unlimited domains" to "Host Many Domain Names"? :D

This post is not a proper place to debate about Netscape Vs IE, but I definitely feel that NS is a better browser (though I use IE just because it's bundled with my OS CD, and I use dial-up connection with an expensive per hour/minute rate and so it's not possible for me to download NS all the times. ).

:beer:

ooh ouch not so nice in NS4, but i agree with allmark heh

Who in there right mind would still be using Netscrape 4 ?

Potential customers?

I'm surprised that Alan let his site go live without testing it in NN4+.

If he is entirely ignoring NN4+ (he will positively not get any customers who view his site in NN), he is being niave.

If not, its very sloppy to make it live like this. It sends out the wrong signals entirely on his part.

This sort of 'oversight' is accepted for hobby sites - not for commercial sites.

Sarah.

Geez, it was a mistake and yes an over sight by me and my designer. Time to go and download netscape.

looks fine in netscape6

Those guys are talking about the old, old Netscape 4.x

I've checked the site with Opera, looks fine. But I think the bottom is kinda weird (it looks like the left part of the table is on the right hand and viceversa).
You could check it ;) The fastest Browser on Earth (www.opera.com)

Where can i get the old netscape from?

ftp://ftp.netscape.com/pub/communicator/english/4.79/windows/windows95_or_nt/

as easy as that ;)

It's me again: I thought I'd post what I've meant with the inversed sites in the "rebel" browser ;) (I coudn't edit my old post, because when editing, you can't upload a picture...)

Oh, it is really bad in netscape. And ive got no idea how to fix it..

Old Netsuck didn't like tables set in % check all of the table settings...

I noticed that now there is a little to how many domains you can host


:bawling:



MaFiDoM

Originally posted by mafidom
I noticed that now there is a little to how many domains you can host


:bawling:



MaFiDoM

There is no such thing as unlimited and at $0.50 per domain you can't complain.

Netscape problem should be fixed now.

A big thanks goes to HostIT

no problemo :)

just be sure you remember to sort out those little order form issues when you get a chance, otherwise you'll have NS people agreeing to blank terms and conditions when they sign up hehe

and btw, this doesn't mean everyone can now ask me to make their site cross-browser compatible :D

oh yeah i see your netscape warning message on the order form :)

I like the new design, but there's a couple of problems. I'm using Mozilla for Linux, and most of the pages (every page except the home and reselling page) have parts of the left border missing. Also, the message "NETSCAPE USERS: You will not be able to order using netscape, please use internet explorer to order. Thanks" is discouraging to people like me that only use Linux.

Well its better to have a notice than no notice until i fix it.

How many people still use Netsuck 4.7 and below anyhoo ?? :eek:

I mean its slow 80% of the sites on the net don't show right or wont even show up.....

You would have to be brain dead to use it :stickout

Originally posted by allmark
How many people still use Netsuck 4.7 and below anyhoo ??

According to our logs around 0.8 percent actually :D To be honest it's not worth the extra time and expense to make our own site compatible for Netscape, and many designers I know feel pretty much the same way. Unless the site literally explodes in that browser, I wouldn't worry about the change too much.

Greg Moore