ewhost
09-03-2004, 12:02 PM
Just wondering, why did you go with AN instead of going with Managed and their other datacenter directly?
Even if it's cheaper, you should realize that if you go with a reseller, you're taking the risk of either reseller or datacenter disappearing, while if you go direct with a datacenter, you only run the risk of datacenter disappearing.
Classic case of "you get what you pay for".
Also, you people shouldn't blame Managed. They are providing what they are paid for. They don't get paid, they don't provide server to AN. AN doesn't get server, you don't get server. Managed is just doing business, you shouldn't blame them. Some of you are trying to get Managed to turn back on your server to get data even though that server is WAY overdue in terms of payment (payment to them for the server; your payment to AN is your payment to AN, doesn't count as having paid Managed).
Even if it's cheaper, you should realize that if you go with a reseller, you're taking the risk of either reseller or datacenter disappearing, while if you go direct with a datacenter, you only run the risk of datacenter disappearing.
Classic case of "you get what you pay for".
Also, you people shouldn't blame Managed. They are providing what they are paid for. They don't get paid, they don't provide server to AN. AN doesn't get server, you don't get server. Managed is just doing business, you shouldn't blame them. Some of you are trying to get Managed to turn back on your server to get data even though that server is WAY overdue in terms of payment (payment to them for the server; your payment to AN is your payment to AN, doesn't count as having paid Managed).
