HiVelocity
07-19-2004, 10:54 PM
I would be curious to hear your thoughts on AMD's Quad-Opteron servers. I am looking for your comparisons against Quad-Xeons.
![]() | View Full Version : About your luck with AMD Quad-Opteron? HiVelocity 07-19-2004, 10:54 PM I would be curious to hear your thoughts on AMD's Quad-Opteron servers. I am looking for your comparisons against Quad-Xeons. alexmue 07-19-2004, 11:16 PM as always it mostly depends on what you do :) when you have a fully 64bit application it should run faster on opterons. linux is available in 64 bit, so i would assume opterons would do better on a lot of cpu-intensive hosting stuff (like big mysql-tasks) actually i am also intrested in good opteron servers (dual 244 or more, quad?) unfortunately no host offers resonable opteron servers. just a few hang around with the minimum (240's) config for unserious prices but as i saw in other tread a dual opteron 244 wont come out more expensive than a dual xenon 2.8. so it should be possible to offer both with about same price. i hope some providers wake up soon :) is there already a VPS-OS in 64bit available? that would be nice a VPS on a quad opteron, with maybee 8 VPS's on the server, that should make much power with good price. cwl@apaqdigital 07-19-2004, 11:29 PM http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=1982 anandtech has an article for 4-way opteron 848 vs 4-way Xeon MP (including the 4M L3 model). the benchmark includes Forum Database, SQL database, and Enterprise Performance. and once again, Opteron 848 (2.2G) w/1M-L2 smokes the Xeon 3.0G w/4M-L3 on either 2-way or 4-way. RyanD 07-20-2004, 07:30 AM the opteron overall will scale much better :) |