Web Hosting Talk







View Full Version : Why I'm trying Burst.net


jp_howard
10-20-2001, 12:01 AM
Thanks to all those people who offered advice on selecting a dedicated host. For those who missed the earlier threads, I've been running my IMAP-enabled webmail service, http://fastmail.fm, on a dedicated server at RackSpace (http://www.rackspace.com) and have been very happy with the reliability and service for the last 12 months (before that their network was very unstable). However I've been looking for someone with better pricing (both cheaper, and with a less overpriced upgrade path--Rackspace charges for every little thing by adding a hefty chunk to the monthly fee).

A large number of hosts were suggested, both by customers and vendors. The most surprising discovery was how hard it was to actually complete a purchase. Most vendors could provide a better price than was listed on their web pages--it's off-putting to find high prices listed; but if you email directly you do generally get a better quote. Many online ordering sites had faults that made orders fail. Many sales departments failed to get back to me. The most extreme example is Pegasus Web Technology (http://www.pwebtech.com/), who were univerally praised by their customers, yet all links on their site to pricing and ordering dedicated Linux servers were broken, and a request for a quote was never responded to after a week, despite a reminder! If I'd been their customer and had needed an additional server online fast, I would have been in real trouble...

I had similar mixed messages with BurstNet (http://www.burst.net) who failed to provide a quote when requested, but did so within an hour after I sent a reminder. They also closed my sales ticket before the quote was complete, meaning that I had to re-open a ticket to get them to take my money!

But on the up-side, when I actually got through their convoluted and less-than-robust ticketing system, they were great! I explained that I want minimal up-front cost, and they were flexible enough to bump up the monthly fee a bit and remove the up-front cost altogether, which is great for us because we'll probably be adding quite a few more servers as our customer-base expands. They also offered to provide more advanced configs like private switches and load-balancing for reasonable fees. I've been tracking their network reliability over the last week by pinging their server from Rackspace every 15 seconds. The results are pretty good: 98% of packets returned successfully
99.9% of packet pairs--at least one packet returned
One down-time of 2 minutes, one down-time of 75 secs
Of packets returned successfully, latency <100ms 99% of the time
Latency <300ms 99.7% of the time
Some of the dropped packets may be due to Rackspace rather than Burstnet, although in my experience that is very unlikely. The level of performance I observed is not quite best-practice, but it's good enough for me (if my customers can't handle waiting 2 minutes for their mail once a week, then I guess they'll have to go elsewhere!)

In the end I've decided to try BurstNet. They seem genuinely interested in doing a good job, and their pricing makes trying them out reasonably low risk (30 day money back guarantee). Very impressively, they upgrade all hardware to current specs for free every 6 months--an offer I haven't seen elsewhere. All the complaints I've seen seem to relate to their dreadful ticketing system, which clearly needs a overhaul and a much more disiplined process needs to be followed. Hopefully these problems will be worked out in the near future.

I sure hope that this works out. Shopping for providers has been a frustrating experience. I hope that some vendors out there are listening and consider learning from Rackspace, who I'd say are the leaders in purchasing systems by an order of magnitude. Please, provide your best price on your web page, and provide a form to fully customise orders including CPU, RAM, HDD, and bandwidth pre-purchase. Just let me give you my money with a minimum of fuss, which saves you time and saves me time! Provide ready-to-go preconfigured servers with a guaranteed 24 hours setup time, and 72 hours for customised servers.

maxbear
10-21-2001, 05:02 PM
Hi jp_howard,

I have servers with rackspace and EFS. I also consider burst before. But their additional bandwidth seems to too expensive. Did you get a better bandwidth price with them?

SoftWareRevue
10-21-2001, 05:06 PM
Originally posted by jp_howard
. . . . .In the end I've decided to try BurstNet. . . . .Update us after you've been there awhile please. :)

jp_howard
10-21-2001, 05:11 PM
Originally posted by maxbear
I also consider burst before. But their additional bandwidth seems to too expensive. Did you get a better bandwidth price with them?I haven't discussed bandwidth prices with them, because I don't expect bandwidth to be an issue for our site (we are text-only; not a single graphic on the site!). Maybe you should shoot them an email to see if they have some flexibility in pricing.

PS: SoftWareRevue--yes, I'll give an update in a couple of weeks on the success of the server setup, and in a month on support/network reliability. Please nag me if I forget. My email address is jATemlDOTcc .

Domenico
10-22-2001, 04:46 AM
Originally posted by jp_howard
they upgrade all hardware to current specs for free every 6 months--an offer I haven't seen elsewhere.

Can you tell me more about this please?

BurstNET
10-22-2001, 11:37 AM
<< MOD EDIT >>

BurstNET™ Dedicated Server Upgrade Policy *

Following every 6 months of consecutive service, contract may be upgraded
to hardware specifications currently offered for the same pricing level as currently held.

* Available to all contracts signed after March 1st 2001.

Sean, please read the rules next time:

Participants may not use the Forum to direct others to any pages at their own commercial website, including informational pages.<< /MOD EDIT >>

cperciva
10-22-2001, 11:41 AM
Sean, what do you do with all the old hardware which people upgrade away from?

BurstNET
10-22-2001, 11:54 AM
The FBI/CIA uses our old hardware to run the country :-)


Some of it is re-used for building additional servers. Some of it is used for replacement parts. Some of it goes to build staff workstations. None of it goes to waste...

All fully tested again before being re-used mind you...

Whatever the oldest stuff in stock is usually goes into our $99 cheap server specials...
ie...whatever we want to blow out...usually celeron 400 chips.



Sean R.
BurstNET

jp_howard
10-25-2001, 03:25 AM
I promised I'd give an update after a few days, so here goes. I haven't used enough providers to know whether my experience to date with burst.net is good or bad relative to other providers, so I'll just post the facts.

The install took about 72 hours from finalising the order. However this was with only a quarter of the RAM ordered, which they told me they would get in 12 hours and I could use the machine in the meantime. George, the techie that did the install, was very impressive. He genuinely knew his stuff and really cared about doing a good job. He went the extra mile by custom-compiling a kernel which contained a patch for the recent Linux kernel exploit, and only compiled in the drivers needed, which I appreciated. He forgot to compile in high memory support, so when the RAM arrived it wasn't all used by the kernel. He forgot to compile in iptables firewalling, and also set the BIOS incorrectly so that the CPU speed was 500MHz rather than 800MHz. George provided sound advice on paritioning strategy, including suggesting mount configurations appropriate for our IMAP/SMTP partitions.

The next day the server was taken down without notice. I couldn't get through on the phones (no answer) or Instant Messenger (no answer). At first they didn't believe me that I had tried to call, but when they checked they told me that their phone system had gone down. I still don't have a backup phone number in case this emergency happens again. :( Email was answered after a couple of hours (I was frantic by this stage!); it turns out that someone thought that the server was not yet handed over to us, so it had been unplugged. When they realised the error they put in the new memory and got it back on line. About 2 hours later it was again turned off (again without warning) but only briefly--apparently they went to put the RAM in again, not realising that it was already done.

I was very impressed by the network speed when it came to transferring data across. I got 800KB (yes, K-BYTES) per sec, in the middle of the night US time. I've been up and running for 2 days now without incident. Sometimes their routers seem to hiccup and I have to re-login, which is frustrating but not a show-stopper.

Well, that's my experience. Hope it helps some people with their decision making. Overall it's certainly been a lot less professional than Rackspace, but the price is better, and they went the extra mile with the kernel install that Rackspace would charge a bundle for. I'll make a decision about whether I stay in a month.

maxbear
10-25-2001, 04:24 PM
Hi jp_howard, thanks for you update. Please let me know whether you will stay with them or not.

I would like to ask is rackspace faster or burst.net faster? Do you know what bankbone is burst.net using? I know RS use several bankbones.

BurstNET
10-25-2001, 05:36 PM
Taken directly from our site regarding our connectivity:

The Network Operations Center is connected via a OC192 fiber connection to Verizon™ (Formerly Bell Atlantic PA). BurstNET™ utilizes redundant DS3 (45mbps) connections thru Sprint™ (http://www.sprint.com) and AT&T™ (http://www.att.com).

<<MOD EDIT:>>
If you'd like to read the rest of this information (which I've edited), including future plans, please see the site.
<</MOD EDIT>>

Regards,
Sean R.
BurstNET

Chicken
10-25-2001, 07:23 PM
Sean, he asked about your bankbone... ;)

Originally posted by maxbear
Do you know what bankbone is burst.net using? I know RS use several bankbones.

Maxbear, I think you meant backbone? :D

BurstNET
10-25-2001, 08:52 PM
Oh, my bad :-)
I'm not sure what kind of net connections our bank(s) have...probably T1 lines from the local branches...to likn to the head offices....heh

Sean R.
BurstNET