pitchford
10-14-2001, 12:12 AM
I am trying to configure RH 7.0 to do virtual hosting using IP-based scheme. I've gotten apache configured properly, but can't get virtual anonymous FTP to work with WuFTP. I want someone to come in and ftp.domain.net and receive domain.net's anonymous FTP site; and someone go to ftp.domain4.net and receive domain4.net's FTP site.... Currently I've gotten all anonymous FTP to go to domain.net's FTP site. (All setup in Webmin)
------------- SAMPLE DNS CONFIGURE ------------------
$ttl 38400
domain.net. IN SOA 192.168.1.25. email.domain.net. (
1003023566
10800
3600
604800
38400 )
domain.net. IN NS 192.168.1.25.
domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.25
mail.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.22
www.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.25
cp.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.24
server053.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.20
server058.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.21
db.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.23
dns1.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.20
dns2.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.21
ftp.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.25
--------------------- END SAMPLE ---------------------------------
mail.domain.net goes to the mail server; cp.domain.net goes to the control panel, db.domain.net goes to the database server, etc... You get the picture.
Can anyone share a more logical database structure?
Thats it for now!
Thanks!
Tommy Pitchford
------------- SAMPLE DNS CONFIGURE ------------------
$ttl 38400
domain.net. IN SOA 192.168.1.25. email.domain.net. (
1003023566
10800
3600
604800
38400 )
domain.net. IN NS 192.168.1.25.
domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.25
mail.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.22
www.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.25
cp.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.24
server053.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.20
server058.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.21
db.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.23
dns1.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.20
dns2.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.21
ftp.domain.net. IN A 192.168.1.25
--------------------- END SAMPLE ---------------------------------
mail.domain.net goes to the mail server; cp.domain.net goes to the control panel, db.domain.net goes to the database server, etc... You get the picture.
Can anyone share a more logical database structure?
Thats it for now!
Thanks!
Tommy Pitchford
