View Full Version : can a 1.7 celeron handle very active forum + shoutcast?
Rahde 01-29-2004, 09:03 AM i'm looking into dedicated servers, reliablity and cost are main issues.
after reading some posts, servermatrix looks good
their cheapest plan:
Intel Celeron – 1.7Ghz
512 Ram
80GB ATA 100 7200 RPM HDD
1000 GB Bandwidth
99.9% SLA Guarantee
RedHat Linux
i'm wondering if it can handle a forum with ~2000 members, around 100 active at peak times with around 1600 posts a day pumping out ~80gigabytes of bandwidth a month. this is an invision board. i'm also looking to host a small shoutcast radio on it, max users 50, i will lower the users and/ reduce bitrate if bandwidth is a problem.
however i'm wondering if the server mentioned above can handle all of this. can it handle it easily? or barely?
Rahde 01-29-2004, 09:04 AM oh the radio is not on 24/7
basically i'm saying won't worry about the bandwidth, just the cpu/mem specs
eddy2099 01-29-2004, 09:15 AM The shoutcast would probably should not be a problem but the forum depending on what you use, may or may not handle it. Try getting a P4. It should probably do better.
Rahde 01-29-2004, 09:22 AM Originally posted by eddy2099
The shoutcast would probably should not be a problem but the forum depending on what you use, may or may not handle it. Try getting a P4. It should probably do better.
we are on a very very very small budget :)
we are using invision 1.3 final without any mods
eddy2099 01-29-2004, 09:29 AM I guess you could try.. If it is very busy, it will just be slow but will still do the job.
We've got customers running in a similar spec VPS's running with 5-600 users with no serious problems. Of course there might be other bottlenecks we don't hit
Rus
phpdeveloper 01-29-2004, 02:13 PM Two things are a must here: mysql caching and php scripts caching, with those 100 online users can be handled by this spec without noticeable slowdowns.
Rahde 01-29-2004, 02:38 PM is php caching handled by apache?
and what about mysql caching
nettigritty 01-29-2004, 02:40 PM servermatrix looks good if you're in the US and can reach them on the phone. Their email / ticket responses are ... how do i put it .. sllooowwww! I'm still waiting for a respose for something I sent them over a week back.
phpdeveloper 01-29-2004, 02:46 PM mysql caching can be enabled by tweaking mysql config file.
for php scripts caching you need to install one of the available caching modules: php accelerator, turckmmcache, zend accelerator.
Rahde 01-29-2004, 02:54 PM out of the php modules, which one would you recommend to be the best?
phpdeveloper 01-29-2004, 03:00 PM I'd go with turckmmcache, their site:
http://turck-mmcache.sourceforge.net
Testtube302 01-29-2004, 03:58 PM I totally agree with phpdeveloper Iam using it on my sites and boy what a difference :)
ca-uk 01-29-2004, 04:44 PM we have a celeron 1.7ghz machine that runs a forum of similar proportions, but using phpbb - the loads we experience with 100 active users are at worst up to 0.20 - most of the time it runs at 0.01-0.05.
it takes more of a hit on our box processing webstats!
like the guys have said, mmcache for php and turn on query and thread caching in mysql...
Steven 01-29-2004, 10:30 PM Go with TurckMMcache
optimize mysql
also a upgrade to a gig of ram would help out alot.
dsotmoon 01-29-2004, 10:56 PM Originally posted by phpdeveloper
I'd go with turckmmcache, their site:
http://turck-mmcache.sourceforge.net
I read somewhere that you can only run one or the other, so should I uninstall zend optimizer in favor of turck?
HMHAdmin 01-29-2004, 11:46 PM I think Zend is way better than turck.
Steven 01-29-2004, 11:51 PM Have you ever seen the benchmarks for Turck VS Zend?
|