http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fvalidator.w3.org%2Fcheck

I saw this on some other forum, thought i'd share it.

:eek2: :D

Very Nice. Who knew a feedback loop would produce this error. ;)

Cheers
Jeff

hey nice

Liam

LOL

Aww damn I've gone a spat grape juice into my keyboard now

Rus

The validator is the worst tool ever made!

heh nice!

It returns some very interesting information :D

The Dude :)

hahaha... good one :)

Is it for real? Is it accurate? Or is it just a joke?

the w3c validator only supports basic HTML.

A lot of the new things people use in their html tags show up bad on the validator! If your site is validated, it probably looks like it was made in 1995, although not always the case, just mainly.

It supports XHTML, which is the current standard. The things that show up as faulty with it, are IE specific coding, or just plain bad coding.

Yeah, it supports XHTML and with XHTML/CSS you can re-create pretty much anything that's possible with HTML. I've seen many XHTML 1.0 sites that look nothing like they were made in 1995...

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fvalidator.w3.org%2Fcheck%3Furi%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fvalidator.w3.org%252Fcheck

Ha, that is nice.

Originally posted by etogre
If your site is validated, it probably looks like it was made in 1995, although not always the case, just mainly.

Counterexample:

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.simpli.biz%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=%28detect+automatically%29

www.simpli.biz

:D

(Yes, this took special effort on our part, but it was worth it.)