This article might be of interest to people here.

http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1278-210-6559611-1.html?tag=bt_pr

I find it amusing when someone puts a site that moves 300 gigs a month onto a shared plan with a provider that offers unlimited bandwidth. They lost a fair bit of cash (not to mention the bad PR) on the customer mentioned in the article.

From the Article
757," acknowledged that a $70-per-GB charge (after the first 2GB) had been imposed in February.

70.00 !!! per gig .. and people say I'm expensive :eek:

A different article on the exact same situation was discussed here a few weeks ago, by the way:

http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?threadid=13016