Hi all,
Not sure if this is the right place to post this, but it's a security question. (Mods: Feel free to move this thread.)
I've come across a "chained" SSL certifiacte offered by FreeSSL: http://www.freessl.com/chainedssl/chainedssl_new.html
After reading the information, I'm clueless as to the differences between a "chained" and a normal SSL certificate.
Can someone please explain the difference?
Thanks,
Max
Nevermind, I found the link explaining the details. However, would you trust a chained SSL or would you get a normal SSL certificate?
Do you want your customers know you are not using a professional cert (as stated in the their site)?
If no, then I suggest you pay $20/year more and buying a cert from
instant SSL or
Geotrust cert in Rackshack.
Good point. I was under the wrong impression that ********** is also a "chained" SSL - as stated on FreeSSL's site:
Some Certification Authorities, like Comodo, do not have a Trusted Root CA certificate present in browsers, therefore they need a "chained root" in order for their certificates to be trusted - essentially a CA with a Trusted Root CA certificate issues a "chained" certificate which "inherits" the browser recognition of the Trusted Root CA. These SSL certificates are known as "chained root" SSL certificates.
And as far as I understand, ********** is a part of Comodo. Am I missing something?
I'd definately prefer to pay $20 more and get a real SSL certificate.
Max
Also, ********** (Instant SSL) is blocked on WHT - a good indication that something's not right.
sprintserve
06-02-2003, 07:57 AM
We use instant ssl. They are fine for the purpose. They had been banned for a long time. Perhaps they unwittingly advertised here sometime in the past. In any case, their service are great and prompt. No issues at all
The point of FreeSSL site is not for money, but to make some of their compeitor looks bad. (my personal opinion only) So I never use FreeSSL product.
In fact, more browsers trust Instant SSL and ChainedSSL than Geotrust does. But, all are good to use.
mlovick
06-02-2003, 09:45 AM
Originally posted by mno
Also, ********** (Instant SSL) is blocked on WHT - a good indication that something's not right.
They were blocked for spamming.
There certs are OK though. I have had no complaints.
nainil
06-02-2003, 10:51 AM
You can never depend on a Chained SSL cert. Never. Never.!! It is highly vulnerable to attacks.
Thanks for your replies :) From the start I didn't really trust FreeSSL because I read about other people's experience with them. At this point, I'm seriously considering getting the GeoTrust certificate through my web host - they offer the same price as Rackshack does.
Thanks again,
Max
mlovick
06-02-2003, 01:37 PM
Originally posted by nainil
You can never depend on a Chained SSL cert. Never. Never.!! It is highly vulnerable to attacks.
OK - interesting:
http://www.its.monash.edu.au/security/auscert/2002-08/msg00043.html
I had not heard of this b4