OK.. I am stuck, not sure which way to go here. Can I get some pros and cons from the members with experience on this. I just can't decide, I like the ease of PDQ but DramSystem has the benefits of more customization I believe. Any guidance from those with more experience in the matter would be appreciated.

I got DRAMS to play with (no plans to use it live) and its a pretty nice system. Ive never looked at the PDQ offered by Enom though. Also interested in people opinions on this...

I use DRAMS and really like it. It is easy to customise, you have choice of cc processors and it comes with some nice templates. The team are usually fast to respond to support requests and update the system regularly.

When I was deciding on which to go with I decided against Enoms PDQ mainly because of cost and flexibility, PDQ has a yearly cost of $99 and you have to use Enoms credit card processor which is very expensive at $0.95 plus 3% of the transaction, however, I hear their fraud protection is very good.

One advantage PDQ has over Drams is that PDQ is developed by Enom so they are always update with changes they make to their API. Recently enom changed the number of domains a script could look up at once and it took DRAMS a few days to release a patch for this.

Hope that is of some help,

Ad.

PDQ is very good, the only problem is that it is using frames and as far as I know it is not very user friendly.

I think ive been on a PDQ site and could tell it was an Enom reseller. With Drams its really easy to get a custom look, even the default template isnt bad!