View Full Version : which is better to have please
7thdesire 03-31-2003, 11:02 PM i am about to buy another dedicated server but i have got bigger
so which one is better for me do you think a server with a set say 400gb per month or a server with a 10mbps line and some please tell me the best way to go ie how much bandwith a full use could i get out of a 10mbps line
inteltechs 03-31-2003, 11:07 PM 10mbit = 3200 GB in theory but I am pretty sure you can't push that much :) ....
petertdavis 03-31-2003, 11:07 PM Lot of other, more important factors to consider, if you're making a comparison between two different networks. A full 10 Mbps line is more than any single server really will need (yes, probably a few odd exceptions to that rule). I'd say, one in a hundred servers even come close to eating up the 400GB that you'll see offered from companies like Rackshack.
7thdesire 03-31-2003, 11:15 PM thanks but if i have 60 customer on there each using 30gb each if they used it all 60x30gb i guess it would be better to get a 10mbps line instead of a set bandwidth limit like 1000gb that you can get at rackshack
seg fault 04-01-2003, 12:49 AM If you can put more servers on the 10mbit link, get that
If it is only going to be one server on the 10mbit, i would prefer to get the 400gb since it would likely be burstable which would make the connection faster
petertdavis 04-01-2003, 01:13 AM Originally posted by 7thdesire
thanks but if i have 60 customer on there each using 30gb each if they used it all 60x30gb i guess it would be better to get a 10mbps line instead of a set bandwidth limit like 1000gb that you can get at rackshack
I couldn't really imagine putting those customers all on the same server.
TheVoice 04-01-2003, 01:17 AM I could easily. Just because they use bandwidth doesn't mean they're server intensive. And 30gb is nothing. I have 10 sites on one server that do 30gb a day each. Also rackshack servers are capped at 10mbit anyway so its not like you would get any burstability.
petertdavis 04-01-2003, 01:24 AM If you could easily, then I doubt you've dealt with a lot of accounts that push that type of traffic.
TheVoice 04-01-2003, 01:26 AM "I have 10 sites on one server that do 30gb a day each"
I do 5 TB a month in bandwidth. I know what I'm talking about.
petertdavis 04-01-2003, 01:28 AM lol, ten maybe on a nice server, but sixty.... yea.
TheVoice 04-01-2003, 01:31 AM He has 60 customers that do 30gb a month not per day.
petertdavis 04-01-2003, 01:46 AM I'm not sure what your point is?
VNPIXEL 04-01-2003, 02:07 AM it depend. If you know you will use that much of bandwidth then get the 10mps line. I have a client that use 1000 gigs of bandwidth in 2weeks.
>Also rackshack servers are capped at 10mbit anyway so its not >like you would get any burstability.
400GB and 1000GB packages from rackshack are at 100Mbit.
TheVoice 04-01-2003, 02:30 AM Please have someone from rackshack confirm this. I have 6 400gb rackshack servers and I have never got more than 10mbit of throughput through them.
mpope 04-01-2003, 06:03 AM Yep.. we use high quality machines, and max out at around 200GB/month per machine. We cap our machines before they become too overloaded though... and we use high quality stuff (SCSI! heh)..
Go for the cheaper one at RS. From what I understand you can buy 4 of the cheaper servers for what 1 of the 10MBbps servers cost. Well... it would be much better to split the sites across 4 servers IMHO.
|