klisis
05-15-2001, 11:41 AM
Hey Matt, by any chance, might you allow 60 by 60 avatars?
 | View Full Version : 60 by 60 avatar. vizi 05-15-2001, 04:35 PM 60x60 would be nice, but it might raise bandwidth big time. CRego3D 05-15-2001, 05:01 PM Originally posted by vizi 60x60 would be nice, but it might raise bandwidth big time. :bawling: AbuHasan 05-15-2001, 10:08 PM Originally posted by klisis Hey Matt, by any chance, might you allow 60 by 60 avatars? Why you need them? Vortech 05-15-2001, 10:12 PM then whats next 70 x 70.. J/K dektong 05-16-2001, 12:04 AM Originally posted by CRego3D :bawling: hua..ha...ha... poor Carlos... :D How much bandwith does WHT now use per month? 20GB? Come on... you can easily afford that, can't you Carlos? :) OK.. bigger avatar :) cheers, :beer: CRAVIS 05-16-2001, 01:44 AM I think that the current size is enough to add some fun to our posts. The problem is not just about the WHT transfer - there are people with slow connections and they have to wait ........ Nicholas Brown 05-16-2001, 03:32 AM Originally posted by CRego3D :bawling: Ha ha Ha - So I guess Matt hasnt told you about his plans to stream British tv from main eh? :eek: :D (SH)Saeed 05-16-2001, 03:35 AM I don't think it's a good idea to change a rule just because of a personal request. Today klisis wants 60x60, tomorrow someone else will have a 65/65, then we should change it for him/her as well. The day after that someone will need 72/72, etc.. edude 05-16-2001, 03:38 AM Yes 60*60 would be good, then i could have a bigger flag :) |